Tom (and other film scanner owners), do you think Digital ICE support in the hardware is worthwhile?
>From what I can tell, the Konica-Minolta Elite series has hardware ICE while the Dual series does not. There's obviously a big price difference. Someone else this morning mentioned they'd pick ICE support over higher resolution. I have to balance scanner speed, quality, and cost; US$600 is about my spending limit and batch scanning is a must. Tim On 10/3/05 11:18, Tom C wrote: > I've used the Scan Dual IV for a year and a half. Before that I had the > original Dimage Scan Dual. l was never disappointed with either for the > money, and the IV is much nicer. > > I don't have experience with any other film scaners (except Pacific Image), > but from what I've read in reviews, the Scan Dual IV produces results equal > to other scanners costing twice the price. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > >> From: Tim Sherburne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: [email protected] >> To: Pentax Discussion List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: advice for filmscanner >> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:43:20 -0700 >> >> >> I'm on the precipice of enablement for one of these. I'll be interested to >> see what others say. Comments in the PDML archives are generally positive. >> >> t >> >> On 10/3/05 6:12, Frank Wajer wrote: >> >>> Hi again, >>> >>> how about the Konica Minolta Dimage scan dual IV? >>> Looks like a nice scanner to me? Anyone use this one? >>> >>> Frank >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > >
