> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3755687&size=lg > > > > Sorry Frank, but I would say it's the work of an artist ;-) > > > > I agree; the dancer's definitely an artist! ;-)
Frank. I think there are at least four artists involved here. First there is the artists who has created the music. Then the dancer and the choreographer have made a perpetration of the music. And then you have made a perpetration of those artists work, the artistic event. First you have made a very good composition of the event. You have also made a selection of one precise moment. You have also made some artistic choices about the lighting, and so on. All this choices are artistic choices. When the choices are as successful as here, I will say they make you an artist. You are in the full right to disagree with me, Frank. You may disagree in silence, or speak out your disagreement. But, you may also accept the compliment ;-) Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -----Original Message----- > From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30. september 2005 18:30 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: A Dancer's Arms > > On 9/30/05, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a very good photograph. > > I have spent some time watching it. At first glance it is good, after a > > while it is very good. > > Sorry Frank, but I would say it's the work of an artist ;-) > > > > I agree; the dancer's definitely an artist! ;-) > > Thanks for your thoughts, Tim. I appreciate it. > > cheers, > frank > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >
