On 29/9/05, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed: >I guess that sort of sums my feelings. I agree with Paul that I haven't >found 6 MP inadequate, but then what have I to compare it to? Suppose we >took a photo and wanted to crop it by some factor for display or printing. >Assuredly a 12, 16 etc., megapixel camera will allow this to be done with a >higher degree of (dare I say resolution) quality, than a 10MP camera, or >than a 6MP camera.
Excuse me for being a complete dolt here. But can someone tell me what the point of an APS-C sensor DSLR at 16 or even 12 MP is? Sincerely, I fail to see it. If they're going to cram 16 MP onto a chip that size, why not just make a 24x36mm sensor? Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________
