Assuming that someone still makes a semi-professional/home film scanner,
let alone a commercial grade one.
Patrick Pritchard wrote:
I shoot a variety of film. My two SuperProgram's are using Delta 400
now, my RB67 uses a mix of FP4+ and Delta 100, and for Macro work
(Pentax auto bellows) I'm starting to use Pan F+.
I'm also investing in a film scanner soon, and I don't think I'll ever
go the DSLR route. Why? If I shoot film today, and scan it in a 2700
DPI scanner, five years from now when I can afford a 5000 DPI scanner
I can *rescan at 5000 DPI*. If I shoot digital today at 6.2 MP, five
years from now when I can afford a 12 MP DSLR, I can't reshoot the
photos I've already shot at 6.2 MP.
Film makes sense; it provides a nice baseline against the
ever-changing landscape of digital darkroom technologies. :)
-p
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
- Re: anybody still shoot film? P. J. Alling
-