Good call Bruce. As I mentioned to Jack I was trying to emphasize the sky. But I think your right. Half the sky is wasted space. Unfortunately the only thing that would have been in the foreground, had I included more, would have been the rocks of the mole I was standing on. The pano crop works well though.
Thanks for you comments. Dave On 9/24/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Overall I really like this. I must say that my first look was with > some stronger ambient light in my room - this made it more difficult > to see the shadows. Because of the strong emphasis on the sky (more > than half the frame), I didn't even notice the boat. The boat is > really what makes it for me. It doesn't seem like the upper portion > of the sky really adds much, so I would have liked to see just a bit > more foreground and a bit less background. Without being able to > reshoot it, I played around with cropping the top. To me it really > strengthens the shot - sort of looks more like a panorama that way. > > My 2 cents. > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Friday, September 23, 2005, 7:55:28 AM, you wrote: > > DS> G'day All. > > DS> This week my little corner of the world has been treated to some > DS> beautiful sunsets. Unfortunately, I've had to work through them all. > DS> Except today. > > DS> As I tend to do when I want to relax & unwind, I went down to the > DS> harbor to watch the sunset. I took this shot of the harbor pilots > DS> launch going out to one of the many vessels waiting to berth and I > DS> thought I'd share: > > DS> http://tinyurl.com/b8sbs > > DS> <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_010.htm> > > DS> Comments of any kind welcome. > > DS> Dave > > > >
