You cant be serious or are you?? I wonder...
anyway, I am ABSOLUTELY convinced to my satisifaction
that the possible cost savings of this parts removal
cant be anywhere near the value of its inclusion
to K/M users and potential K/M users. We didn't
even discuss that, it not only disables the K/M
lenses you own, it disables all the K/M lenses
you might have owned but never will because of
the disablement...

If you want all that extra stuff (proof?) to somehow
prove me right or wrong I suggest YOU do it.
My name is not McFly, Biff and I am not
going to do your homework for you. Maybe
you can find a mole at pentax to infitrate
there board meetings minutes documents?? :)

JCO

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:27 PM
To: pentax-discuss
Subject: RE: Camera engineering (was Re: Rename request)


J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>YOU cant be reading my posts because I already
>have REPEATEDLY stated that there is no way
>the parts implemention cost doesn't justify
>its continued feature in the body. If this
>part cost the camera buyer $200 more or $100
>more or even $50 more would have something to even talk
>about, but this removal didn't save anywhere
>near those amounts of money. I would seriously
>estimate under $20 BUYER PRICE COST over the product run and
>support of the Fine K/M lenses of which there
>are propably millions of them and is well worth
>$20 even if you don't have any yet on $600
>purchase. If the camera was $100 total price it would be something
>to consider but its not a $100 camera. It's a complex
>very sophicated camera missing a cheap simple parts
>that would enable dozens of great lens models costing thousands 
>of dollars to fully operate properly.

J.C.,  I read your previous posts.  You've stated several times that full 
K/M compatibility costs are justified.  You've quoted low per-camera parts 
costs to back up your statements.  I'm interested in your estimates for two 
other important factors:  how much NRE to design, integrate, and test full 
K/M compatibility, and how many lost sales if the work is not done? 

 --Mark


Reply via email to