Your not being reasonable or logical. Moving parts are not desirable if the same thing can be achieved without moving parts but REMOVAL of basic essential functions just to achieve "no moving parts" is absurd. That's a really silly argument. It mirrors the earlier reliablity argument. Its better to have a needed function with reliable moving parts than to just remove it completely. Wow. I cant believe the extremes you people are going to try to justify this damn thing. Do you really expect anyone to believe you would really rather keep pushing green buttons and stopping lenses down if you didn't have to just to keep that really pesky $5 "moving part" out of you camera? In other words if Pentax offered you a free exchange of your camera for one with full K/M functions with the cam sensor in there you wouldn't trade because the camsensor moves? I find that very hard to believe. The lens cam is moving anyway so there is already moving parts and "wear dust" ( that's really comical). Green Button is "optimum" for K/M? Your credibility just went down about 10 notches in my opinion....
JCO -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: green button wars (again) Personally, I don't want any more moving parts in my digital SLR. Moving parts wear. Wear creates dust. Dust contaminates the sensor. Keep the moving parts out of my SLR. The green button is an optimum solution. > Re-installation of the $5 lenscam sensor. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:36 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: green button wars (again) > > > How might the "green button" be improved? > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Gonz > > > I'm glad Pentax implemented the green button though > > of course, but they could have done a better job of it. > >
