Many thanks, Shel. I appreciate your comments. I would be more than happy to share what I do - I'm not sure that it is much different than you. I do have to say that the DA 16-45 lens is much better than I had imagined. It performs much better than my old FA*24/2 did on digital. You may want to test it a bit on the NorCal outing and see how it does for you.
-- Bruce Sunday, September 18, 2005, 8:08:12 PM, you wrote: SB> Hi Bruce, SB> I sure like this one, and so many other of your pics. Generally the detail SB> and the tonality are just outstanding on my monitors. Per4haps one day you SB> can give me a lesson on how you're able to render such detail, like the SB> bricks on this building. I just don't think I can equal that. SB> Shel >> [Original Message] >> From: Bruce Dayton >> This was taken on a recent trip with my daughter. It was kind of >> interesting because I shot from the bottom of the hill that this sits >> on. It was surrounded by a wrought iron fence. I had to poke the >> camera lens through and then put my left hand through to focus and >> zoom. >> >> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Circular polarizer, handheld >> ISO 200, 1/90 sec @ f/9.5, spot metering >> Converted from Raw using Capture One LE >> Post processing done with Picture Window Pro >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2222-2.htm
