> Fred wrote: >>> I've heard this lens has some sort of problem. How bad is it? What sort of >>> problem.
Nope - Fred did not write that. >> It's not SMC. It's not as good as the A* 135/1.8 or the K 135/2.5. >> But, if you don't have to pay too much for it, it can be a decent-enuf >> 135 (200mm "effective FL" on the D/DS/DL). (I think it's really an >> f/2.8 lens, but I won't quibble too much here...) Yes, ~that~ was what Fred wrote. Fred
