Hi Leon, the smaller size and zoom range of the 20~35 currently is of greater interest than the greater size/weight/range of the 16~45.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Leon Altoff > Subject: Re: FA 20~35 > > Shel, > > If you are only going to use it on the digital bodies you might like to > consider the 16-45 instead. I have both and have not used the 20-35 > since I stopped using the MZ-S.
