Yes. Also, if one of you digital dudes would shoot a gray card frame edge to
frame edge with one of your digital primes (say between 20 and 35 mm or so)
and one of your film primes of *equal* focal length, I would be interested
in comparing light fall off at the corners. Tripod mount camera on
centerline wit perpendicular from the center of the gray card. Light gray
card evenly with two side lights placed on each side of the camera and such
that there is no equal angle reflection from the light to the card to the
lens. No flash. Just like you were photocopying art.
Regards,
Bob...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By all means, marry. If you get a good wife, you'll become happy;
if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
- Socrates
From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all.
I am curious to ask, for those who have had a lot of experience using your
favorite ol' 35mm film lenses on APS digital bodies (D & DS), which
specific lenses seem to be "just as good" (or perhaps "even better") in
digital use? And, conversely, which lenses seem to be "not as good" in
digital use? Please note that I am asking primarily about ~optical~
differences, although some of you might have other characteristics to
mention, too. (And, obviously, there are across-the-board differences in
"apparent FL" due to the APS "cropping", and differences in metering,
especially for K and M lenses, etc.) I ask as a DS "newbie", who has
tried
a few film lenses out, but who has not noticed much in the way of
differences (yet), but who has not examined carefully looking for 'em yet
either.
Fred
