In a message dated 9/1/2005 2:05:47 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a DS which I purchased in November of last year. When I shoot for more than a few frames (like, concert photography) at ISO800, there are 13 (!!) pixels of varying shades and brightnesses that are there in every frame. You'd consider that a dud camera/lemon?
Maybe it's time to take advantage of the 1-year warranty before it's too late, but goodness me I don't want to be without the camera over the holidays! Who would be the person that needed to be convinced of that being a warranty-covered defect? -Charles ========== I don't know if I would consider 13 a defect. 20-25+ and above. But, hell, why listen to me? I know nothing about the D or DS. Maybe they have some information somewhere on what their pixel failure rate is supposed to be. (Actually, if companies don't, it seems like a good idea for various camera companies to have pixel failure rate statistics.) Anyway, I know nothing. Most of the time I am perfectly happy with that. But I do have to say post something now and then, though, just to show that I am alive and kicking and still here. ;-) I picked this thread. Random draw, your luck of the draw. Marnie aka Doe
