I realize that the moon is "nearly full", but it still looks oval to me. My imagination, I suppose. Exposure is a bit tricky and you've done well. Spot metering? I don't relate any foreground elements to the moon, but simply look at it as an effort at proper moon exposure.
Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 8/21/2005 1:22:24 PM Pacific > Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > don't know if I'm happy with this or not but for > your edification > > Nearly Full > > http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_nearlyfull.html > > No technical data, I'm feeling lazy, (and it's too > hot). > > As usual comments are welcome but may be totally > ignored. > > -- > When you're worried or in doubt, > Run in circles, (scream and shout). > ============== > It's fine. But missing something for me, not sure > what. I think I'd like the > moon bigger. :-) > > This is one of those time a little photoshopping > (yes a verb) might be fun to > try. Cut and paste the moon bigger. > > Nyah, not a real suggestion, if you don't like that > kind of thing. > > I'd be clearer on what it's missing for me, if I > could. But it's an okay > shot. Nice neutral tones. > > Later, Marnie aka Doe > > ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
