OK, but no different than shooting film with the same Canon glass.
The main problem is that with digital we are used to inspect the technical
quality of our images far more severely than we did with film, just because
it's so easy to do that. Maybe not everybody, but at least I find myself
acting that way.
At the end, on average we spot a lot more lens problems that we did in the
past.
Dario
Sure, but if even a third of EF optics do not work than there's a
major problem IMO.
2005/8/23, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It all depends on the lens in use. The macro shot has no visible corner
problems.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thibouille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: News from Canon... FF for 3300$
> Seems the FF brings problems.
> Only very good quality would be usable (yes, this is rumors) but check
> this pictures from Canon site... this sucks !
>
> http://web.canon.jp/Imaging/eos5d/html/eos5d_sample_3e.html
>
> They aer out of focus in the corners. So this is the technical problem
> making an FF sensor not usable with usual FF film lenses?
>
> ----------------------
> Thibouille
> ----------------------
> *ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
>
--
----------------------
Thibouille
----------------------
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
