Thank you Godfrey, Shel and all. for the suggestions and John Francis and John Graves for the photographs.
We didn't make it out to SFO finally (next week now) and Berkeley on Saturday was wonderful. Now I have to get around to developing film instead of piling it up. Regards, Gautam > -----Original Message----- > From: John Graves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: San Francisco > > > It is big but this is what I saw: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3650817 > > This is on Kodachrome using my PZ-20 & FA 20-35 > > John Graves > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > >I have a bunch of shots of the bridge from both the water > >via tour boat and via the observation area near the bridge. > >Shot them all on K64. This was from spring '96 long before > >I got a scanner so I don't have anythinng to post, never got > >around to scanning them but I do still have them. The wide > >angle shots are pretty cool from the observation area. > > > >Did you know the suspension cables are actually a bundle > >of wires approx THRE FEET in diameter? Huge! > >jco > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 1:12 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: San Francisco > > > > > >On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 12:40:47PM -0400, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > > > > > >>Try to take a picture of that famous bridge they claim to have up > >>there. Every time I tried to photograph it, all I saw was fog and more > >> > >> > >fog. > > > >That's not necessarily a bad thing: > > > > <URL:http://www.panix.com/~johnf/gallery/images/muir12.jpg> > > > > > > > > > > > >
