Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most of the recent US presidents have been hell bent on starting wars, Nixon
seems to have been commited to ending them.
I dont know a great deal about American history but, who was the last president
_NOT_ involved in a military conflict?
Besides, being involved in a military conflict isn't the same as being
"hell bent on starting" them. Would anyone seriously suggest, for
instance, that Wilson and FDR started, respectively, WWI and WWII? But
they were involved (eventually.) (I know, not recent. Just the first
examples that come to mind for illustrating the difference between
"starting" and "being involved.")
