As I said, it was a quick comparison...and I didn't
perceived differences in magnification when changing
between one and the other. I am sure that, with more
time, I could have find it...
My point is that I expected the difference to be more
obvious.
Anyway, there are other differences that make the Ds a
more logical choice than the DL at the same price...
Regards,
Jaume
--- Carlos Royo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > About the viewfinder, both had a Sigma 18-125
> mounted.
> > Although my brain was all the time: 'remember, the
> DS
> > has a pentaprism and the DL a pentamirror...', my
> eyes
> > could't see the difference. Actually, if someone
> tells
> > me 'you MUST choose the brighter', I would choose
> the
> > DL.
>
> Jaume, did you notice any difference in their
> magnification? Being the
> DS 0.95 and the DL 0.89, I think this would be the
> most noticeable
> difference, not the relative brightness of the
> viewfinder.
>
> Carlos
>
>
______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
