----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:22 AM Subject: Re: Re: Why choose *ist DL over Nikon or Canon competitors?
> > fra: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > . > . > > They should switch to Canon and not look back. > > (Stay on the PDML however; it just makes it more fun<g>). > > I don't know. We've got enough people who have switched to Canon and are regretting it because they find that it didn't really make a difference to their photographs, but in stead of admitting it they stay around criticising Pentax for not being what they wanted it to be .-) If you are refering to me, you are wrong. I have no regrets about my decisions. My experieince, ie, going out and shooting pictures as much as I can, has improved my photography. I got results I was proud of with film and the LXen, MXen, etc. I got results I was proud of with the *ist D and I get results I'm proud of with the 20D. Why are some of my 20D pictures better than my *ist D pictures which were better than with film? It aint the camera or the media; it's me. And BTW, I'm going to hang around on this list because I still own Pentax cameras and lenses (not that it's a neccesity; Graywolf's FAQ don't mention it). And I'll voice my opinion WRT new DSLR releases because it's my god-given right to have an opinion of a company I had/have so much respect for. When they make stupid decisions (IMO) I'm going to tell it how I feel about it. Christian
