I agree at the 1GB point, but compare at the 4GB capacity and microdrives
are significantly less. I'm taking some long trips where I want more
storage than 1GB so I don't have to manage alot of CF's.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: CF card: normal or Microdrive?
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 17:48:37 +0000
With 1 gig CF cards now selling for eighty bucks or so, I can't think of
any good reason to go with a microdrive. The fewer moving parts, the
better.
Paul
> Actually what i said is that they don't work well =at high altitudes=,
not
> that they don't work well.
>
> Glad we cleared that up.
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Date: 5/24/2005 10:02:27 AM
> > Subject: RE: CF card: normal or Microdrive?
> >
> > Not a problem at all Shel. It's just that you started out with a
blanket
> > statement "Microdrives don't work well", and I thought that was a
> misleading
> > assertion.
>
>
