My comment was a bit TIC, Rob. You young digital whippersnappers <LOL> are so serious about your digital domain at times. Here's the smiley ;-)))
And a few extra for the times when there's doubt about my seriousness ;-))) ;-))) ;-))) ;-))) ;-))) Shel > [Original Message] > From: Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 5/23/2005 4:44:04 PM > Subject: RE: Understanding exposure? Recommendations? > > On 23 May 2005 at 12:51, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > Not in todays environment Bob. Just blast away, "capture" innumerable > > frames, and sooner or later you're bound to get one that works as a > > photograph and tells a story. Then fix it in Photoshop and send it off to > > the lab where the tech will push a button (no need to watch the machine or > > pay much attention to the print itself), and, POOF! out comes a perfect > > print. You're so behind the times ... > > It seems a lot of old farts are feeling more than a little irritated about the > fact that this is a possible option for many these days. Why not just > concentrate on what you know best and let others experiment and enjoy their > photographic tools and options?
