Graywolf wrote:
Is it now? A chimpanzee could get a decent photo out of 14,000 shots.
BTW, has anyone heard of DNA showing that humands are a sub-species of
Chimp? Came across it in a SF story and wonder if there was any truth to
it or did the author make it up. Claim was that there is much more
variation in chimp's DNA than human's, and that human DNA only varied by
about three strands from the chimp's.
Nowhere near so much. Only a couple of percent difference between us,
chimps and orangutans.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/22/2005 9:11:25 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yep, you all should go back to using the Speed Graphic. One sheet of
film = seven great photos (old Speed Graphic ad). Hum..? That
certainly is different from 14,000 digital shots = one OK photo.
--grin--
graywolf
=============
OFA!!! OFA!!! OFA!!!
Old fart alert.
<grin>
Marnie aka Doe
