The point wasn't to address your diatribe, but rather to point out that Sony could build things that were useful, functional, and cost effective for many needs. Regards, Bob S.
On 5/22/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which doesn't address my statement in the least, but I will address > yours. If a 4mp Sony P&S suits you needs > more power to you. It wouldn't address mine. I have no wish to see my > system of choice, (and we can debate > until the cows come home weather Pentax manufactures a system or not, > but I say they do), replaced with incompatible proprietary > crap with lessor build quality. The only thing Sony would want if they > bought Pentax would be their name. That worked so > well for Yashica /Contex when Kyocera bought them. > > Bob Sullivan wrote: > > >My Sony S85 at 4 meg has been a fine camera. > >If I wasn't such an equipment snob, > >I would have thrown over the Pentax 35mm long ago. > >The Sony equipment is pretty handy and the results good. > >...only problem is the shutter lag. > >Regards, Bob S. > > > >On 5/22/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Cheaper crappier lenses, new completely incompatible lens mounts, (Sony > >>has the not invented here syndrome in Spades) Sony Memory Stick instead > >>of CF or SD cards oh yes a brave new world. > >> > >>John Whittingham wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>>That would give at least one cool thing, they'd gain easily access to > >>>>Sony sensors. Maybe faster, maybe better sensors... > >>>> > >>>>There has to be a good thing right? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Yes and perhaps a massive injection of money, better DSLR's, better > >>>marketing, higher sales figures, more money, better > >>>DSLR's.................:) > >>> > >>>John > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>-- > >>A man's only as old as the woman he feels. > >> --Groucho Marx > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > A man's only as old as the woman he feels. > --Groucho Marx > >
