I really like it. The bokeh is a *lot* less troublesome than has been
my experience with the FA 135 2.8 and, looking at some of the other
pics, it's also pretty clear that it is much less inclined to blooming
in high-contrast situations (a problem I've consistently had with the
FA 135).
-Marco
On May 16, 2005, at 10:19 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Now that you've had a chance to look at some of the pics, what do you
think
of it? The bokeh on this shot looks better than I remember the bokeh
to
have been in the pic made with the other 135 yon had. The woman
certainly
looks adequately sharp, esp for wide open.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Marco Alpert
That was the 135 at 2.5 (thanks!).
-Marco
On May 16, 2005, at 9:49 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Marco .... Was that the 135 or the 150?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Marco Alpert
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso16.html
Comments (of any variety) welcomed.
-Marco
