Three things about digital photography are superior to film: 1) Fast results and at home - no camera shop visit needed. 2) Fast and costless change of ISO value. 3) Better DOF at the same AOV.
Three things about film are superior to digital photography: 1) Optional better resolution (so far) 2) Longer life/presence of the pictures. 3) Proven,lasting and widely spread technology = cost efficient (film has been arround for a century). So, there's realy no need to be a luddite. There's no need to choose either one or the other. Some printing technologies use elements from both "worlds". Both chemical and electronic photography exists side by side. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 17. maj 2005 04:04 Til: [email protected] Emne: Re: Can I be a ludite please?! On 5/16/05, Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well not really. I refuse to give up my DS. <snip> No, you can't be a Luddite. Not until you learn to spell it properly, anyway. <LOL> cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
