You're correct if "acceptable" means "identical." But if you're saying that beautiful BW prints are impossible with digital, you're wrong. Paul
> I can't imagine finding an acceptable B&W solution, Paul. I've looked at > so many B&W prints that had their basis in digital, processed and printed a > myriad of different ways, on different papers, with different printers, > different labs, exhibition quality and crap, and I've yet to find a single > one that provides what conventional B&W film does when printed on real > silver paper. I'm of the mindset that it'll never happen, no matter how > good digital gets, because there are just too many physical differences > between the processes. > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Paul Stenquist > > > Yes, I am sold on digital, and I was very dubious about it at first. I > > think you would eventually work out a good digital BW solution. Albano > > seems well on his way. > >
