Well, just matching the needle and using auto exposure is exactly the same 
thing. Now intelligently adjusting for different lighting, say back lighting, 
is easier with a manual camera than with an automatic camera. With a manual 
camera you just change the f-stop or shutter speed a couple of stops. With the 
auto camera you have to go to a fourth control to override the camera. Of 
course with most advanced auto cameras today you can select manual control, but 
the fact that you do not use that normally makes the adjustment that comes 
automatically to you after awhile on the manual camera something you have to 
think about with the auto camera.

Skills do require constant practice to be something you do almost without 
thinking. Only using them sometimes, if you learn them at all, does not work as 
well.

As for auto focus, anyone who gets a higher percentage of in focus shots with 
auto focus simply does not know how to focus his camera. It is a skill easily 
learned if someone shows you, but hard to figure out on your own.

Of course most snapshooters do not have any desire to learn how to be a 
photographer they just want pictures of their kids and vacations. Amateur 
photographers on the other hand are interested in photography and should learn 
everything about it they can. Gadgets do have their fascination and most modern 
multi-mode auto cameras cater to that with a vengeance. I do not think it helps 
in learning photography however.

graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------


Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, William Robb wrote:


Before automation, you had no choice about learning the technical end of
photography. It was part of the game. You learned how to adjust an aperture
and shutter speed to match a needle in the viewfinder.


<snip>

Automatic exposure does not necessarily give correct exposure, it gives a
best guess exposure, that guess coming from a rather retarded brain.


I cannot see how these two differ, assuming the same metering
algorithm behind the needle reading/auto exposure. Actually, the auto
exposure has a higher chance of being consistent for a learner on the
same scene (assuming that the learner bothers to change the aperture
or speed setting).

Kostas





--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.6 - Release Date: 5/6/2005



Reply via email to