Hi Boris ... I dl'd your pic and rotated it, and didn't lose the shoe ;-)) Is there more than one shoe in the pic? I only see one.
Thanks for you comment about the thoroughness inherent in the pic. Coincidentally, I just responded to a post from John Francis about that very subject. In truth, I'm not yet completely satisfied with the pic, but it's coming together. If you don't want to post them publically, would you send me one or two privately? Shel > [Original Message] > From: Boris Liberman > > I don't understand what you mean by my shot being "very thorough." > > One where all the details, even the smallest one are taken into account > and worked upon. > > > Overall I like your photo, but it has some elements in it that lessen its > > impact. The most glaring, as i see it, is the tilted horizon. It looks > > about 1 - 1.5 degrees skewed to the right. This tilt, amongst other > > problems it causes, works against the tilt of the boat. By that I mean > > since both the boat and the horizon are tilted in the same direction, the > > skewed position of the boat is given less importance and strength than it > > could have had. > > > > I like the old shoe in the pic. Nice touch. And while I understand what > > you are doing by including the two people sitting on the wall, I'm not sure > > they add much, if anything, to the photo, other than being a distraction. > > This shot is full frame. If I were to rotate it I would loose a shoe :(. > I know it is not an excuse but it is at least some reason why. > Three positions, six shots all together. I will probably post one more > if I successfully process it. > > Boris
