In other words, an image need only elicits a glandular
reaction in order to qualify as "art".
Don't they all?

Jack


--- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:49:50AM -0400, P. J.
> Alling wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Art is painful to look at
> > > 
> > >
> > >Art is disruptive of normality
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > >Art questions, reduces and simplifies our
> experience of life
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > >Art is clear, straightforward and uncomplicated.
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > Based on these definitions, Art is a guy.  It's
> early in the morning,  
> > He needs a shave.
> 
> And if you don't like him, it's your fault - not
> his.
> 
> 


                
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

Reply via email to