I feel that opposite is true, there are more people taking high quality pictures now than ever. Learning curve with digital is much faster because there is no penalty for taking more pictures. I am talking about people who actually want to learn photography.
People who take snapshots are at the mercy of auto everything in camera as they were before with film when processing in Wal-Mart or similar store which does not even look at the pictures. If they are used to processing in pro lab and want better pictures I am sure these same labs would be happy to take care of their jpg-s and make them look right, it would be best if these people would shoot raw and let pro labs do the processing like they did with film. Maybe that is what you are talking about ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Digital profligacy > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Zaninovic" > Subject: Re: Digital profligacy > > > > Or maybe your business is not going the way you would like. > > It hasn't been since long before digital came along. Automatic exposure was > the start of the long slow inevitable slide into the crapper for > photography. Digital is just another bump in the road. > > William Robb > >
