Well said, Mr. Cotty.

On May 3, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Cotty wrote:

May I just make a little point here please?

I don't believe that it says anywhere on Doug's PDML.net web pages that
anyone actually has to own a single piece of Pentax photographic gear to
subscribe to this list. In fact, the 'About Us' page describes the
subscribers as:


'...we remain a loosely allied gang of threadheads, robophotographers,
hobbiests, geeks, wienies, manual focusers, theorists, feature counters,
psychos, purists, one large cross-dresser (that we know of) and another
guy who just disagrees.'


<http://www.pdml.net/dbrewer/p1.html>

I personally think that is a very important point. There is much more to
this list than just owning and using Pentax equipment. Sure, the obvious
thing is that most, if not all, subscribers have, or have had, or even
would like to have, Pentax gear at some point. After all, the P in 'PDML'
stands for Pentax. Nobody expects contributors here to start asking what
the bokeh is like on a Canon lens, or a Nikon lens, or even a Pentacon
lens, that much is true. Similarly, just because a contributor decides to
ditch and switch to a different brand, does not automatically mean that
that person should consider their options WRT hanging around here. I can
sell all my Pentax gear but actually still have an interest in it!





Personally, I ditched and switched, and I'm glad I did - I wouldn't consider any of Pentax's latest digital offerings. They just don't suit me. So why do I still hang around here?

Two big reasons.

The first one is that believe it or not, my favourite camera of all time
sits on a shelf above my desk. It does not work anymore, it certainly
won't win any beauty contests, and I'll likely never put another roll of
film through it again. Yet this lonely black Pentax MX represents a place
and a time from years now passed - a place and time that I was very happy
with. Still am. But even if I did not own this camera, I would still have
the memory of it, and that is just as valid. Fond would be an
understatement. My interest in it lives on. Others agree, and I can
connect occasionally with those people through this PDML conduit. That's
a pretty good reason to stick around.




The second, and IMO most important reason, is the camaraderie. The close
proximity of kindred spirits. The like-minded attitudes and crucially -
the communication. This list is alive: breathing, eating, sleeping,
happy, angry, sad... Hell we even know when someone's had a baby! We
gather for chat and food and experiences, on list - and off. Even in this
day and age, these things are pretty unique. Colleagues of mine are
amazed. "You're meeting up with a bunch of people you met on the
internet???" Yes, well, not strictly, er, look, it's not easy to explain...


This place is very special - and every single one of you reading this
text - from the most prolific poster through to lurker though to the
person who subscribed 5 minutes ago (and is about to unsubscribe with
10Mb of digest attached) - all of you are the reason why.

There are no rules here. It's almost a perfect democracy (cue politics
thread) in that we can all put in our say, but as long as there's
electricity in the wires, willingness in the fingers, and tolerance in
Doug Brewer's smile, this list will continue, and nothing anyone does or
says will change that.


Someone wanted to know why someone sold some gear and bought some other
gear to replace it. I wanted to know. Now we know, and we can use that
knowledge as we will. That's no reason to deny anyone who wants to be
here, whether Pentax owner or not, user or not, dreamer or not, that place.



Pentax has a lot to answer for.



Peace,
  Cotty


___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________





Reply via email to