Christian wrote: >I used the lack of development on Pentax's part as > an argument for an uncertain future.
You did not. You claim in certain terms that Pentax have no plans to make a full frame DSLr as "we all had seen". Where have we seen it? Nobody have argued against an uncertain future. >The full frame argument is moot to me. Pal's "almost" > argument is one of the stupidest things I've read in support of Pentax. > "Well geewiz, guys, give us a break, believe in us, we ALMOST built a killer > camera...." please. Stupidity if any lies perhaps in not understanding the argument. I did not use it in order to support Pentax at all. The argument was that Pentax did indeed develop a full frame DSLR; a bloody expensive one as well. This show a direction and company philosophy. I haven't seen anything indicating that Pentax have changed this direction. On the contrary in fact. Full frame sensors will be offered by all manufacturers when they can be had at price making them commercially viable for companies with less market penetration than Canon. P�l
