Here's the new link: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3326184 I deleted the original before I pulled my head out of my..........
On 5/1/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Loveless" > Subject: PESO and enablement > > Can you see any detail in the hair in the negative? No. There is no detail that I can see on the negative. > It looks like it is printed dark for the filter used, which should be used > to lighten skin tones in this sort of thing. > Other than that, I'd like either a bit of space behind her head, or else the > crop tightened up on the left so no background shows between shoulder and > hair. Agreed. The original was not cropped, so there is no space. So I cropped the left. I also took a little off the top and bottom and cleaned up a few more dust specks. > For the most part, I don't really see the need for a subject to be looking > at the camera with either mock joy or angst when sitting for a portrait. > I like your choice of subject position. Honestly, she was working on a photo album and raised her head to look out the window. I didn't ask her to pose for me. I'm horrible at directing people, so I just wait until I see something that looks good to me. > > William Robb Thanks for the comments! > > > > > > I haven't processed film myself in over 12 years, so I'm really > > starting with no experience. The following photograph is from the > > first roll I've developed. It's a portrait of my wife taken a few > > days ago. K-1000, Super-Takumar 135/3.5 M42 mount, medium yellow > > filter, Tri-X 400, D-76 1:1, scanned, unsharp mask, and removal of > > most of the dust. That's it. Feel free to criticize, critique, or > > laugh (at the photo, please, not my wife). > > > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3326065 > > -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com
