I would be delighted to have discussion of bettering techniques to digital and darkroom printing, but rational discussion of this sort seems impossible on PDML given the obstreperous nature of some subscribers here.

I welcome those interested to discuss photography without attitude and bigotry to join SeePhoto, the photo mailing list I admin. It's a list with modest activity ... pictures to look at and critique, discussion of interesting facets of all kinds of equipment with no brand-specific bias. One of the most important rules is courtesy to others, something that often seems absent on this list.

If you're interested, there's a subscription page at
  http://www.micapeak.com/lists/seephoto
There are several PDML subscribers already participating.

Godfrey

On May 1, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

I agree. And earlier today I pointed out how silly these discussions have become. The message you cited was in response to a message from Shel that was obviously meant to provoke. In any case, I am over it as well.
Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Frantisek wrote:



I have "gotten over it", but I would rather like to discuss how to better
one's technique in either digital or darkroom printing, but these
discussions often turn into such as this one... It's indeed apples and
oranges, in my opinion both can look good but are different. That's why my gentle
reminder.


Still with all respect,
                       Frantisek

Sunday, May 1, 2005, 8:41:34 PM, Paul wrote:
PS> It's obviously an opinion Frantisek. Get over it.
PS> On May 1, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Frantisek wrote:

PS> Digital compares favorably with a good film image. No, in fact, a
6.1
PS> megapixel digital image is better than almost any 35mm film image.


Paul, "in fact"? Who made you the judge of that? Please remember what
are the IMHO and YMMV abbrevs for.


With all other respect but sorry, this again ticks me off, Frantisek






Reply via email to