Thanks Paul! I can tell you that I'm my own biggest critic. I appreciate
the positive remarks from you, Mark and Ken.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PESO - Spring Rufous
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:19:21 -0400
Very nice. Background is better than what I'd expect from a mirror lens,
and the shot looks quite sharp in the web image. Good look at a beautiful
bird.
On Apr 29, 2005, at 6:44 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Yea.
Both are good captures that need no excuses for the mirror lens.
What ISO was used?
Now lets see some wing flapping!
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 2:45 PM
Subject: PESO - Spring Rufous
http://www.photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=285074
Click on thumbnails per ususal.
Taken about 45 minutes ago. Rufous Hummingbird in the willow outside our
front door, doing watch duty on the food supply.
Pentax *ist D and Tokina 500mm f/8 mirror lens. Equivalent to 750mm on
the
*ist D. Handheld between 1/160 and 1/250 second.
I always enjoy this lens. Background is always a little odd. Comments
yay,
nay, or otherwise, welcomed.
Tom C.
