My preferred option here would be--not to focus!-- I've got 5 MP pictures that I'm convinced could be blown up billboard size with no loss of definition!

At 6:18 PM +0000 4/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Medium format or large format film would be a better choice than 6 MP digital. 35mm won't buy you much. Perhaps a little if you shoot Velvia or another fine grain film that resolves well. I haven't printed larger than 13 x19 from 6 MP digital (which is quite excellent), but Tan and some others report good results at 20 x 30. Interpolation method would probably be important. And viewing distance enters into it. From six feet away, a 20x30 from digital probably looks fine. From a foot away, I'm sure it's quite loose.


 I haven't considered this in a while, but I'm looking at doing some very
 large work (to me)... at least 30" - 40" in the largest dimension.  I
 suspect film will be a better choice for capture medium than a 6 MP camera.

 Tom C.



 >From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 >Reply-To: [email protected]
 >To: Tom C <[email protected]>
 >Subject: Re: Film is dead...
 >Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:45:04 -0700
 >
 >That would just make film very sluggish, rather than dead <grin>.
 >
 >--
 >Best regards,
 >Bruce
 >
 >
 >Monday, April 25, 2005, 10:37:14 AM, you wrote:
 >
 >TC> It's not dead.  I just bought 32 rolls of 220 and they're alive in my
 >TC> refrigerator. :)
 >
 >TC> Tom C.
 >
 >
 >
 > >>From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > >>Reply-To: [email protected]
 > >>To: <[email protected]>
 > >>Subject: RE: Film is dead...
 > >>Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:27:08 +0200
 > >>
 > >>I don't hope film is dead or dying.
 > >>I just bought (Joe Wilensky's) MZ-S - I want to shoot slides again! :-)
 > >>
 > >>Jens Bladt
 > >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > >>http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
 > >>
 > >>
 > >>-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
 > >>Fra: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > >>Sendt: 25. april 2005 19:12
 > >>Til: [email protected]
 > >>Emne: Re: Film is dead...
 > >>
 > >>
 > >>We teach several courses at my college based on traditional film
 > >>photography.  They are inevitably overfilled with long wait-lists.  The
 > >>funny part is that the camera of choice is (still) the K-1000.  (I have
 > >>let student borrow lenses and even gave my old Tak 135 2.5 to I student
 > >>I knew.)  I think we are seeing digital becoming the main stream method
 > >>of choice and film becoming an artistic alternative.  Since many
 > >>amateurs treat photography as an art from, film should continue to do
 > >>well.
 > >>
 > >>
 > >>Steven Desjardins
 > >>Department of Chemistry
 > >>Washington and Lee University
 > >>Lexington, VA 24450
 > >>(540) 458-8873
 > >>FAX: (540) 458-8878
 > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > >>
 > >>
 >
 >
 >
 >




--
Alan P. Hayes
Meaning and Form: Writing, Editing and Document Design
Pittsfield, Massachusetts

Photographs at
http://www.ahayesphoto.com/americandead/index.htm



Reply via email to