On 4/14/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No I didn't ... show me where i said that. All I said was that the eleven > prints I examined were of poor quality and that the results were wildly > inconsistent, and cited an example of one list member's prints that looked > substantially different in three separate instances.
ok, i made an assumption. if you compared a consumer level lab print to a consumer level inkjet prints, i find your conclusions strange and inconsistent with my own observations. > I wouldn't expect you to see any decline or fall ... thank you very much for getting personal. it's so much more fun this way. best, mishka
