I'm on the "don't like it" side; there's too much OOF stuff, and the two in-focus areas don't look like reflections so much as two weird objects floating above the path.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:51:59PM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Thanks, it will be interesting to see what the final tally is on this > one. So far, I think about 2 like it and several don't. > > One thing is for sure, there seems to be no middle ground. > > -- > Bruce > > > Tuesday, April 12, 2005, 2:44:59 PM, you wrote: > > GI> Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld > >> ISO 200, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6 > >> > >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1645.htm > > GI> Hi Bruce, > > GI> I like this one a lot. It is weird somehow, at first, but you > GI> managed to keep its weirdness within acceptable limits... > GI> Well done! > > GI> Ciao, > > GI> Gianfranco > > GI> _ > > GI> __________________________________________________ > GI> Do You Yahoo!? > GI> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > GI> http://mail.yahoo.com > >
