> In the case of the 50/2.8 Macro at least, the size and > weight haven't changed at all. The letters DG and the > price tag may be about the only difference. > I went with a like new used EX for 1/2 the price of an > EX DG. Been very pleased with it on the D.
I'm getting very sceptical now, the 50mm 2.8 EX is a fine lens, I'd really doubt there is more than perhaps a coating difference between the old and the new. I have the 105 EX and I'm very pleased with the results. John
