Understood, that was meant to compare the SMC to the non-SMC in response to my question about flare. (Hard to follow sometimes ain't we?);-)
Don > -----Original Message----- > From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 8:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: SMCT 135/2.5 results > > > It was this image from earlier in the thread that lead me to > think we were > talking Takumar bayonet: > > http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/135's/135252.jpg . > > > John > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 06:50:23 -0500 > Subject: RE: SMCT 135/2.5 results > > > Yes. > > > > Reference is here: > > http://www.aohc.it/tak04e.htm > > > > Don > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 6:24 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: SMCT 135/2.5 results > > > > > > > > > > That's not what this thread is about; there are no > 6-element versions > > > > of the Takumar Bayonet. > > > > > > Are we referring to M42 screw mount Takumars? > > > > > > John > > > > ------- End of Original Message ------- >
