[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most people can't tell the difference between a print from film and one from digital at a normal viewing difference. I did an infomal test with my portfolio and four people whose job involves judging photographs: three advertising art directors and one art buyer. All of the prints are inkjet. Some are from film, some are from digital. No one was able to distinguish the digital sourced pics from the film sourced pics with anything close to consistency. I'm sure if blown up on a monitor, all could tell the difference. But under normal circumstances, they were indistinguishable. Paul
Sorry, Paul, but in my world all of those are digital prints.
BTW, my previous post _was_ meant to be humorous.
m
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've been very happy with the quality of the DA16-45/4 and don't understand all this flap about it. It's a very good lens.
Godfrey
But Godfrey, by your own admission you can't see any difference between a picture captured on a sensor and one captured on film!
<Whacking big grin>
mike
