Dave
Powell Hargrave wrote:
Perhaps it is flare/loss of contrast with the zoom. I increased the contrast in part of the Take Two image.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Collage2.jpg
No sharpening done. Perhaps the eyes ability to see the differences in contrast make it look
sharper.
Powell
At 12:57 PM 03/04/2005, Don wrote:
OK, here's that roof again. 2 shots with the DA 16-45/4 at 4.0 1 with the M 28/3.5 at 3.5 1 with the A 28/2.8 at 2.8 All upsized to 300% All treated *exactly* the same way from exposure to web.
http://tinyurl.com/4axt4
**I CAN SEE, in the viewfinder, (with the 2x) detail in the shingles *far above* what shows in the DA samples! Both of the 28s give me what I expect, but not the DA.
If someone else had processed these for me I would have accused them of intentionaly blurring the DA samples!
I'm at a total loss to explain how I can see a highly detailed image in the viewfinder with all three lenses but only two of them give a detailed final result.
