On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Hmmm .... looks like that M is quite a bit better than the DA. Isn't the > K28/3.5 supposed to be even better than the M? I mention this only because > Quasi Modo made some comments about new glass being superior to older > lenses.
Can't recall exactly what he said, but the "correct" comparison is with a prime, I should think. Kostas
