Thanks Keith. I think she was extremely self conscious, which might explain the delicate approach to dressing the mannequin. She was very young, twenty I believe. And I was just passing by on the street. I spotted her and asked if I could take a picture while she worked. She consented, but seemed ill at ease. However, I brought her a print a few days later, and she eventually modeled for me. Paul
> > > Cotty wrote: > > > On 30/3/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > > >>Nice stuff, Dario. Here's another where the mannequin plays second > >>fiddle: > >>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1381155 > > > Oh my lord :-) > > > > > > Cheers, > > Cotty > > For an image with so little skin exposed, it's strangely compelling and > sexy! > Yours, Paul? Nicely done indeed. And the lighting is perfect. > > Other than that, I couldn't help but to notice how she uses her very > fingertips to gingerly take the sweater up and off. Interesting and > intriguing... It's only a mannequin, for Pete's sake! > > keith whaley >
