Right you are.  I was just being a smart ass. :-)

I did a quick & dirty perspective adjustment and I think it improves the image.
But thats just me. I'm somewhat paranoid about keeping vertical &
horizontal lines straight <g>. Unless of course I'm going for a
specific effect.

Still and all, its nicley done.

Dave S


On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 20:38:46 -0500, Paul Stenquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
> Nope. Both legs are the same length <g>. The angularity  you're seeing
> is due to perspective not horizon tilt. Note how the horizontals
> incline toward the middle at both the top and bottom toward the right
> of frame. And the center verticals are straight.
> On Mar 25, 2005, at 8:14 PM, David Savage wrote:
> 
> > Very nice Paul.
> >
> > One question though. Is your left leg shortrer than you right?
> >
> > <g>
> >
> > Dave S
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:12:50 -0500, Paul Stenquist
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I did my first walkaround with the new to me FA 35/2. First impression
> >> is very favorable. I've come within a dozen yards of seeing this
> >> subject before but always turned the other way. Today, I happened upon
> >> it. The RAW converter helped me place the one sunlit highlight where I
> >> wanted it. A little extra tweak with the Shadow/Highlight tool. ISO
> >> 200
> >> f5.6 @ 1/250.
> >> Paul
> >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3225777&size=lg
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>

Reply via email to