> I've got a Super Program and a ZX-L,
and I'm on the verge of going
digital.
> So I was interested in this month's issue of PopPhoto.
> They say very nice things about the *ist-DS's resolution, color accuracy,
> and noise, yet the sample photo looks like crap!
> What's up with that? Anybody know?
Frank.
Just listen to the comments of the D and Ds owners and i think you'll be
pleased with the
quality.
I remember asking Bill Robb for a sample after he bought the list's first
istD(i believe
that's
correct) and printed it out here at home.
I was very happy with it,and said i would one day get one,which is didi just as
the stock
wore out.
It took less time to work out menu settings on the D than it did with the
D2H(i'm still
playing
after 1 year)
Only thing that some of us have a problem with is the flash, but the Sigma 500
Super seems
to have
that fixed from what those who havew it say.
Dave
