Ken,
I thought that's what I just wrote below..(?)
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From a compositional standpoint, centered can lead
> to a "static" image, as opposed to the "rule of
> thirds" which tends to lead the viewers eye. Does
> that mean that centered should be avoided? - No.
> Just like the rule of thirds won't automatically
> make an image stronger.
>
> PS rules are meant to be broken.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Mar 22, 2005 1:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PESO: Nearing sunset
>
> Shel,
> My perverse way of discounting photo "rules" in
> general.
> IOW, don't get the idea I'm making a suggestion
> simply
> because It's considered a compositional "rule".
> A bit oblique, I suppose.
>
> Jacl
> --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > What's the "rule" about centering buildings?
> Never
> > heard of such a rule.
> >
> > Shel
> >
> >
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: Jack Davis
> >
> > > Too much non-reflective water. Even though it's
> a
> > > "rule", I'd still like the buildings to be other
> > than
> > > centered.
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> PeoplePC Online
> A better way to Internet
> http://www.peoplepc.com
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
