I'd like to see that comparison as well.
> I'd like to see the FA compared to the K135/2.5 ... up for that some time, > Godfrey? I'd be happy to meet you somewhere, bring a few lenses, and we > can see how they compare on the digi and on film. > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > It's obvious that you get what you pay for. The 135/2.8 is quite > impressive even wide open. > > Paul > > > > > > > Thought it might be fun to pit the brand-new $300+ lens against the > > > single coated Takumar version which cost me $27... > > > > > > http://homepage.mac.com/godders/135cmp/ > >
