I haven't shot a lot of landscapes but those that I recall showed good detail. I made a print from one of Jostein's RAW files that included a lot of trees in the medium distance. If I remember correctly, the detail was quite good.
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:08:51 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > That may be true in theory. I don't find it to be true in > > practice. In my experience, an 11 x 17 print from a carefully > > processed an interpolated *ist D file looks every bit as good > > to the naked eye as a 35mm print. YRMV. > > Do you find that to be true even with images with lots of fine detail? > I'm thinking landscapes with lots of trees in the medium distance, > where you should get lots of details in the branches and leaves and > things. > > TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ > >
