20D is no full frame but at least sits on a full frame path.
 
  Servus,  Alin

Paul wrote:
PS> The 20D isn't full frame. And based on the results I've seen, it's no
PS> better than the *istD, perhaps not as good.

PS> On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:06 AM, Alin Flaider wrote:

>>
>>   The larger sensor (38x50mm?) has pixels almost twice as big (in
>>   area) and should have better signal to noise performance than 1 DS2,
>>   and that will put 645d in different league and command a higher
>>   price. That is, if Kodak does its homework.
>>
>>   Otherwise, sadly the 35 mm full frame from Pentax is as likely as
>>   US signing the Kyoto agreement. Oh well, maybe the 20D viewfinder is
>>   not that bad? I should have another look...
>>
>>   Servus,  Alin


Reply via email to