Just a thought, there's a lot of negative comments re the Chinese version. John
---------- Original Message ----------- [UTF-8?]From: Артур Гроховский <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:56:08 +0300 Subject: RE: Opinions about Sigmas > No, not in China... > May be bad - but there are two examples. Both are bad? How > the people should choose the Tamrons in this case??? > > P.S. This is normal that this Tamron has the price (here in > Russia by one local dealer) 70% higher as Sigma EX 24-70? > > Sincerely yours, > Arthur Grokhovski > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Whittingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 11:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Opinions about Sigmas > > I think you may have had a bad Tamron, ASSEMBLED IN CHINA? > > John > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: ����� ���������� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:07:06 +0300 > Subject: RE: Opinions about Sigmas > > > Hi! > > I have tested both Tamron 28-75/2.8 DI and Sigma EX > 2.8/24-70 > together - one film, one camera. What should I > say? > Tamron is more light, it has very-very fast AF. > > Sigma is very bulky, and slow AF. > But > (by the testing examples) Tamron has significant lower optical > > quality as Sigma. I do not know why. > > > Sincerely yours, > Arthur Grokhovsky > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Dayton > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February > 23, 2005 11:22 PM > To: ����� ���������� > > Subject: Re: Opinions about Sigmas > > Hello > �����, > > You should consider the Tamron > 28-75/2.8 DI lens. It is reasonable > price and > optically very good. I have it and am very pleased > with > it. I have heard that the Sigma offering in that range is > > not that good. > > Food for thought... > > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > ------- End of Original Message ------- ------- End of Original Message -------
